alemannia aachen - sv lippstadt 08

Please confirm your subscription to Verge Deals via the verification email we just sent you. Found insideThis book argues that the law of apostasy and its punishment by death in Islamic law is untenable in the modern period. 9, Jalan 51/205A, Off Jalan Tandang, 46050 Petaling Jaya, Selangor. 09 July 2020. On 13 January Malaysia’s Federal Court reserved judgment after hearing arguments in an unprecedented contempt of court case against online news portal Malaysiakini.com and its Editor-in-Chief Steven Gan for readers posting comments on the site. “Malaysiakini too owes that duty to ensure the preservation of this social behaviour in the virtual world. "It is a lot of money but we are really very glad for all the support we have received," Premesh told KiniTV. Deze bundel gaat over de vorming van identiteit door het samenspel van etniciteit, nationalisme en de effecten van globalisering. Nallini also pointed out that upon being informed of the objectionable comments, Malaysiakini took down the comments within 12 minutes of being advised about it. Refuge for Refugees founder Quah confirmed the filing with Malaysiakini. On June 15 last year, Attorney-General Idrus Harun filed the committal application against the news portal. “Malaysiakini cannot be heard to say that its filter system failed to filter offensive comments, when in fact it deliberately chooses to only filter foul language but not offensive substance. However, the bench, led by Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusof, acquitted its editor-in-chief Steven Gan. PUTRAJAYA, Feb 19 ― The Federal Court today sentenced Malaysiakini’s operator Mkini Dot Com Sdn Bhd to a fine of RM500,000 for contempt over its facilitation of five readers’ remarks against the judiciary on the news portal’s website. PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here has dismissed an application by Malaysiakini to set aside a contempt of court action filed by the Attorney General against the news portal over readers' comments on the judiciary. Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusof says the case against Malaysiakini had attracted worldwide attention. Covering 194 countries and territories, Freedom of the Press 2006 provides comparative rankings and examines the legal environment for the media, political pressures that influence reporting, and economic factors that affect access to ... It's free. Malaysiakini managed to raise more than RM500,000 in public donations within hours of the Federal Court’s sentencing on February 19, and had paid the fine on February 23 which was a day before the deadline. PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here has dismissed an application by Malaysiakini to set aside a contempt of court action filed by the Attorney General against the news portal over readers' comments on the judiciary. Found inside – Page 46They have also shown contempt for these court rulings , for example in the ... According to an article in online news site Malaysiakini . com in May 2006 ... The fine was imposed by a seven-member apex court bench led by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, who said the bench … 9, Jalan 51/205A, Off Jalan Tandang, 46050 Petaling Jaya, Selangor. The Federal Court handed down the sentence during proceedings today. Notwithstanding that, on 15 June 2020, the Attorney General initiated committal proceedings against Malaysiakini and its editor, Steven Gan, for contempt of court. The New York Times reported the verdict on Friday, when a panel of judges found Malaysiakini guilty of contempt of court. The remaining 207 donors contributed below RM10 each. This does not extend to its editor-in-chief Steven Gan who was found not guilty of the same charge, said the apex court. Found inside – Page 7However , the AG's chambers later withdrew the contempt of court charge . ... The courageous online newspaper Malaysiakini is the only truly independent ... KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 14 — The Federal Court has postponed its scheduled decision on a contempt of court charge against news portal Malaysiakini over its readers’ comments, allegedly in contempt of the judiciary. Commenting further, Premesh said the support will push Malaysiakini to continue its mission to report the news fairly, accurately, in a balanced way and hold the powers that be accountable. This study of Southeast Asian media and politics explores issues of global relevance pertaining to journalism's relationship with political power. Subd. The news portal launched its fundraiser immediately after Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusof handed down the sentence, an amount more than double the RM200,000 fine sought by the prosecution. In its fourth edition, the work includes chapters incorporating: * Human Rights Act 1998 * Children and Young Persons Act 1933 * Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 * Civil Procedure Rules - alternative approaches to prejudicial ... “We cannot accept such failed measures as a complete defence. “We Malaysians must use discretion specifically when it comes to posting on the internet as it rests in posterity online. LETTER | Lawyers and media groups have understandably expressed concern over the Federal Court's decision to cite news organisation Malaysiakini for contempt and fine it RM500,000 over five reader comments.. Although one of them was posted by me as a main article (surat pembaca or readers comments). This morning, the Federal Court ruled that Malaysiakini is liable for contempt of court over its readers’ comments and fined the company RM500,000. The hefty sentence, however, does not extend to its editor-in-chief Steven Gan who was found not guilty of the same charge. On 13 January Malaysia’s Federal Court reserved judgment after hearing arguments in an unprecedented contempt of court case against online news portal Malaysiakini.com and its Editor-in-Chief Steven Gan for readers posting comments on the site. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers.Only paying subscribers can post comments. Contempt proceedings against Malaysiakini and its editor-in-chief, Steven Gan, over readers’ comments on the judiciary began at the Federal Court this morning. There being no two ways about it,” she said, adding that this amounted to Malaysiakini facilitating the publication of the comments. A total of 1,544 people donated between RM10 and RM19 each; 1,034 (between RM20 and RM49); 1,477 (between RM50 and RM99); and 1,414 (between RM100 and RM199. As reported by Malay Mail, …. The Court of Appeal President conceded that the present case has attracted worldwide attention of news and media portals, organisations, as well as social media platforms. It’s faced periodic legal harassment within the country, though, culminating in the contempt of court charges that were filed last year. Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court Malaysiakini seeks public's help to raise RM500k after contempt conviction. His father, Raden Hamidi Abdul Fatah, died on 8 August 2014 at the Armed Forces Hospital in Wangsa Maju Kuala Lumpur. Malaysiakini has been fined RM500,000 for contempt of court in relation to the news portal's readers' comments. Let not the social media change this social landscape of our nation. Muhammad Hilman Idham kesal laporan Malaysiakini dan Free Malaysia Today itu memetik sumber yang memberikan maklumat yang tidak benar. Rohana said the news portal misinterpreted the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Content Code when it relied on the code to try to shield it from liability. The Federal Court metes out the fine during proceedings today. “In March 2008, the [ruling party] made its worst showing at the polls in half a century, losing its two-thirds parliamentary majority for the first time since independence. This is the first time Malaysiakini is being cited for contempt of court in its 21-year history. Malaysiakini has settled the RM500,000 fine for contempt of court imposed by the Federal Court last Friday over five readers' comments. Malaysiakini was given three working days to pay the fine with the deadline being the end of business tomorrow. Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court. "Malaysiakini is liable for contempt of court over its readers’ comments, the Federal Court ruled today. The news portal launched a crowdfunding drive to help it pay the penalty after it was found guilty of contempt of court over comments posted by readers. "I think the donors gave it to support a free media and to defend the media so we will look at how we can maybe further that aim," he added. Counsel Malik Imtiaz Sarwar appeared for Malaysiakini while senior federal counsel Suzana Atan acted for the Attorney-General’s Chambers. Found insideThe extent of Islamicity, or what Islam demands, is measured to confirm that self-declared Muslim countries have not adopted foundational Islamic teachings for rule-compliant Muslim communities. Rohana pointed out that it is inconceivable for the impugned comments to have been published when Malaysiakini has a structured, coordinated, well-organised, and impressive editorial team and reporting structure. This after an earlier request by the Attorney-General’s Chambers seeking a RM200,000 fine for the contempt charge. “Though we remained perplexed how these comments even passed its filter looking at the language of the impugned comments,” she said. However, its editor-in-chief Steven Gan (above) was found not guilty of the same charge. Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, who chaired the Federal Court’s seven-man panel, delivered the majority decision by six judges that found Malaysiakini guilty. Its founder avoided a … “The sheer volume cannot be the basis for claiming lack of knowledge, to shirk from its responsibility. “Ultimately, Malaysiakini is the owner of the website, publishes articles of public importance, allows subscribers to post comments to generate discussions. A New York Times Editors' Choice and Best Book of the Year at TIME, Esquire, Amazon, Kirkus, and Electric Literature “No fact or evidence was adduced that the name of the Second Respondent (Gan) had appeared on Malaysiakini in such a way that can be attributed to facilitating the publication of the contemptuous comments,” Rohana said. The court shall not act upon affidavit alone, absent express waiver by the alleged contemnor of the right to offer sworn testimony. Steven Gan, the editor-in-chief, was acquitted as the second respondent. The conviction of online news outlet Malaysiakini on contempt of court charges threatens press freedom, despite the simultaneous acquittal of editor-in-chief Steven Gan, said ARTICLE 19. Gan’s situation was compared to that of Filipino journalist Maria Ressa, whom authorities accused of “cyber libel” after her site Rappler published critical reporting. The Federal Court handed down the sentence during proceedings today. The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) joins its Malaysian affiliate the National Union of Journalists Peninsula Malay (NUJM) in condemning the … With these judgments, media outlets will now have to actively monitor comments posted by the readers on their social media pages. An announcement was made to end collections after the RM500,000 sum was raised - in less than five hours - but support kept coming in and the final tally amounted to RM749,371 from 6,527 donors. Even before the dust settled, the administration was already appealing against the High Court decision to give the rights of citizenship to the children of mothers married to foreigners. Ahmad Zahid bin Hamidi was born on 4 January 1953 in Bagan Datuk, Perak, the eldest son of nine children (seven sons and two daughters) in the family. It is not known when the court will deliver its decision. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. In China's Public Diplomacy, Ingrid d'Hooghe provides a thorough analysis of how China's approach to public diplomacy is shaped by the country's political system and Chinese culture. The fine was imposed by a seven-member apex court bench led by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, who said the bench … The seven-person bench chaired by Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusuf delivered the 6-1 majority decision with dissenting judgment by Federal Court judge P Nallini. The Malaysian government initiated legal proceedings against popular news portal Malaysiakini after readers posted comments that were allegedly critical of the judiciary. “Nevertheless, this unfortunate incident should serve as a reminder to the general public that in expressing one’s view especially by making unwarranted and demeaning attacks on the judiciary in the exercise of the freedom of expression as guaranteed and protected by our Federal Constitution, it must be done within the bounds permissible by the law. for contempt against M’kini Dotcom and its Editor, Steven Gan. This marked the first time Malaysiakini is being cited for contempt of court in its 21-year history. But unlike Ressa, who was convicted last year, Gan was acquitted of personal charges. Found inside – Page 899Contempt of court charges also restricted the ability of defendants and their ... police initiated an investigation of Malaysiakini , the country's largest ... It has full control of what is publishable and what is not. Rohana said the news portal is liable under the law for the contemptuous comments by its third-party subscribers. Perhaps not the fine amount which is, arguably, excessive, but the contempt decision itself? Malaysiakini in contempt over readers’ comments, rules Federal Court Therefore, they are not liable in contempt,” she said. The backbone of the report is a series of overviews of pressing issues in countries from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, with particular focus on the role played in each country by the government and key domestic and international organisations. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. Its CEO Premesh Chandran paid the full amount at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya this morning, following a successful fundraiser that exceeded the targeted amount by nearly RM250,000. “Hence the first respondent (Malaysiakini) is found guilty of contempt of court, the second respondent (Gan) in our view cannot be held guilty for facilitating the publication,” Rohana said. Related reports: Malaysiakini seeks public's help to raise RM500k after contempt conviction. The alleged contemnor must appear in person before the court to be afforded the opportunity to respond to the motion for contempt by sworn testimony. The Malaysiakini online journal in Malaysia is an example of new media which provided an alternative voice and has had a significant electoral impact. Interestingly, the Attorney General had recommended a fine of RM200,000 only, however the Court had imposed a fine of RM500,000 instead. Malaysiakini’s co-founder avoided jail time. Majority and minority judgments in Malaysiakini's contempt case, Umno leaders worried M'kini decision will 'kill' freedom of speech, Malaysiakini seeks public's help to raise RM500k after contempt conviction, Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court, Malaysiakini in contempt over readers’ comments, rules Federal Court, Support pours in for Malaysiakini, concerns raised over press freedom, Foreign missions concerned over press freedom after Mkini contempt ruling, Lawyers: Decision in M'kini case may curtail other news sites, social media, Portals now need to check readers' comments due to court ruling: lawyer. The Federal Court handed down the sentence during proceedings today. She said this is because it was not established beyond a reasonable doubt that the two respondents possessed requisite knowledge of the existence of the third party comments and deliberately intended to publish the comments. The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. “The respondents have, moreover, apologised unreservedly for indirectly being involved in the airing of these contemptuous third party comments. Updated: Feb 23, 2021 2:35 AM. This book rejects the notion that the 1997-98 Asian economic crisis was further evidence that ultimately capitalism can only develop within liberal social and political institutions. Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court The outlet argued that it wasn’t responsible for reader comments, and it removed them after police warned that the comments illegally insulted Malaysia’s judiciary. Malaysian news site fined $124,000 for five reader comments, Sign up for the It is not known when the court will deliver its decision. The Sedition Act 1948 (Malay: Akta Hasutan 1948) in Malaysia is a law prohibiting discourse deemed as seditious.The act was originally enacted by the colonial authorities of British Malaya in 1948 to contain the local communist insurgence. This marked the first time Malaysiakini is being cited for contempt of court in its 21-year history. Found insideNicholas Diakopoulos explains the present and future of a world in which algorithms have changed how the news is created, disseminated, and received, and he shows why journalists—and their values—are at little risk of being replaced. Update 19 Feb 2021: Malaysiakini has been fined RM500,000 for contempt of court, due to comments from readers on their site. She remarked that there was no explanation from any of the editors how the abusive comments escaped their attention. Alexa ranked malaysiakini.com as the 13th most popular web site in Malaysia (first in term of online news portal) in 2015. Related reports: Malaysiakini seeks public's help to raise RM500k after contempt conviction. Drawing on first hand research and written in a clear and accessible manner this is a highly original book providing a detailed account of the political influence exerted by both domestic and international media in the Asia Pacific region. The Federal Court has fixed Oct 12 to hear Malaysiakini's bid to review and set aside its decision to find the online media organisation guilty of contempt of court over five readers' comments.. Read the majority and minority judgments in full. We are looking at what we should do with it. Earlier today, the Federal Court decided Malaysiakini was in contempt, but said its editor-in-chief Steven Gan was not in contempt. It clearly shows the contempt they have for these women and their rights. Found inside – Page iWith the guidance of this book, broadcasting policy and regulation can be tackled as a mainstream development topic, with important consequences for government transparency, government accountability, and enabling disadvantaged ... She explained that despite Malaysiakini’s contention that it is not liable for the comments as it has no knowledge of it due to having taken all necessary steps to safeguard from such liability, she said that the court could not accept this. Misdemeanor contempt. Malaysiakini fined RM500k for contempt. On this note, SUARAM call on the Attorney General to withdraw the contempt proceeding against MalaysiaKini and urge the Federal Court to exercise caution as any shortcoming in judgment for this case would have far-reaching implication and challenge for the development of content moderation and intermediary liability policy in Malaysia. "This 141-page report documents the government's use and abuse of a range of broad and vaguely worded laws to criminalize peaceful expression, including debates on matters of public interest. Malaysian online news portal Malaysiakini was found guilty of contempt of court and fined RM500,000 (USD 120,000) on February 19 in an unprecedented contempt of court decision handed down in Kuala Lumpur. Besides Rohana, the other panel members who formed the majority ruling were Chief Judge of the High Court of Malaya Azahar Mohamed; Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim; and Federal Court judges Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, and Abdul Rahman Sebli. Malaysiakini’s editor-in-chief Steven Gan arrives at the Federal Court in Putrajaya to face contempt of court proceedings over readers’ comments on the news website. And the law does not tolerate contempt of the court as it undermines the system of justice. "We should thank our readers and supporters for their very generous support and contribution to Malaysiakini, for us to be able to settle this fine within three days. She noted that the media has demonstrated their agitation and concern that this case will shackle media freedom and the chilling impact this case may have that will eventually lead to a clampdown on freedom of the press. Being locked up after posting bail is also contempt of court. 09 July 2020. Found insideConstituting Religion examines how constitutional provisions for both Islam and liberal rights catalyze conflicts over religion in Malaysia and feed a 'rights-versus-rites' binary. This title is also available as Open Access. 11.08am: Malaysiakini is fined RM500,000 for contempt of court over readers’ comments. Malaysiakini has been fined RM500,000 for contempt of court in relation to the news portal's readers' comments. “With the novel objective of encouraging public discourse on matters of public interest, Malaysiakini must at least ensure that the Malaysian public be exposed to balanced discussions on the issues of public concern and not participate in demeaning and ridiculing the institution of the judiciary to undermine public confidence,” she said. She said that the irresistible inference is that at least one of them had notice and knowledge of the comments, therefore the news portal cannot deny notice or knowledge of the comments. The human rights records of more than ninety countries and territories are put into perspective in Human Rights Watch's signature yearly report. “In other words, the first respondent (Malaysiakini) designs and controls its online platform in the way it chooses. Advertisement. His father, Raden Hamidi Abdul Fatah, died on 8 August 2014 at the Armed Forces Hospital in Wangsa Maju Kuala Lumpur. Found inside – Page 219... “By Ignoring Custody Orders, IGP Liable for Contempt of Court, ... Malaysiakini ( 2014 ), “PM: Use Apex Court to Resolve Custody Disputes,” June 12 ... Apex court finds Malaysiakini guilty of contempt but spares editor admin-s Feb 19, 2021 A seven-member bench says the news portal is fully responsible for its website, including whatever is published. M Update, 19/2/2021 – The Federal Court, in a 6-1 majority ruling, today found the Malaysiakini news portal guilty of scandalising the judiciary in publishing readers’ comments last year. PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here has imposed a stunning fine of half a million ringgit on news portal Malaysiakini after finding it guilty of contempt … Found insideThe best country-by-country assessment of human rights. The human rights records of more than ninety countries and territories are put into perspective in Human Rights Watch's signature yearly report. Today the Federal Court has fined Malaysiakini RM500,000 for contempt of court over a comment posted by one of its readers. Malaysiakini will know tomorrow the outcome of a contempt of court case against the news portal over a number of comments posted by its readers.. After two postponements due to the movement control order (MCO) which was enforced in Putrajaya, the Federal Court at the Palace of Justice is set to deliver its verdict at 9am. “That is an immediate response, demonstrating their intent not to allow such contemptuous material on their portal,” she said. Subscribe to get the best Verge-approved tech deals of the week. Malaysiakini cannot unjustifiably and irresponsibly shift the entire blame on its third-party online subscribers while exonerating itself of all liabilities. This fact will go a long way to earn Malaysiakini as a responsible portal, for the purpose of public discourse,” Rohana said. Malaysiakini operator Mkini Dot Com Sdn Bhd has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay a fine of RM500,000 for contempt of court, after allegedly facilitating readers’ comments against the judiciary in an article dated 9 June 2020 (“CJ orders all courts to be fully operational from July 1”). This after an earlier request by the Attorney-General’s Chambers seeking a RM200,000 fine for the contempt charge. The excessive fine imposed on Malaysiakini will have a chilling effect on independent journalism and online freedom of expression in Malaysia. Every person who commits a contempt of court, of any one of the following kinds, is guilty of a misdemeanor: (1) disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent behavior, committed during the sitting of the court, in its immediate view and presence, and directly tending to interrupt its proceedings, or to impair the respect due to its authority; Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court. Found insideExplores judicial independence, integrity and impartiality in Asia-Pacific countries. ... or to provide against contempt of court, defamation or incitement to any offence. Found insideThis book discusses multilingual postcolonial common law, focusing on Malaysia’s efforts to shift the language of law from English to Malay, and weighing the pros and cons of planned language shift as a solution to language-based ... newsletter. Found insideThe annual Freedom of the Press, which tracks trends in media freedom worldwide, appears for the first time as an expanded book. Covering 192 countries, the survey provides numerical ratings of the level of press freedom in each country. Ahmad Zahid bin Hamidi was born on 4 January 1953 in Bagan Datuk, Perak, the eldest son of nine children (seven sons and two daughters) in the family. On 19 th February 2021, the Federal Court has fined online news portal Malaysiakini for contempt of court over readers’ comments. Nallini Pathmanathan was the dissenting judge. A seven-man panel of the apex court made the decision here on Thursday (July 2) after hearing submissions from both parties. "It is very generous of our readers and supporters, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic when people are having a tough time out there," he added. KUALA LUMPUR – The Federal Court has found Malaysiakini guilty of contempt, while its editor-in-chief, Steven Gan, was found not guilty in … She however noted that the majority decision found it difficult to presume Gan as publisher per Section 114A, thus finding him not guilty of the contempt charge. News outlet Malaysiakini has raised money to cover the fee of 500,000 ringgit, but human rights advocates say it was targeted for its reporting on government corruption, and they worry that the case could chill political speech online. “Given the fact that the First Respondent (Malaysiakini) news portal enjoys extensive readership and receives about 2,000 comments per day, on top of the fact that it has editorial control over the contents posted in the comments section, the First Respondent must assume responsibility for taking the risk of facilitating a platform for such purpose. 2. News. But didn’t the lawyers and media groups see it coming? Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, who chaired the Federal Court’s seven-man panel, delivered the majority decision by six judges that found Malaysiakini guilty. Federal Court upholds death sentence of ex-school canteen worker; Federal Court to hear Malaysiakini’s review against contempt ruling on October 12; Prosecution files appeal against Ku Nan’s acquittal by appellate court; US citizen escapes gallows, gets 7 years’ jail over ex-wife’s death The majority were small donors - 87 percent of the donors gave below RM200 each, while 526 donors contributed between RM200 and RM499, 196 donors contributed between RM500 and RM999, and 129 individuals contributed more than RM1,000 each. Malaysiakini receives over 2.3 million page-views per day on desktop and mobile. On February 19 2021, the Malaysian Federal Court found Malaysiakini, an online news outlet, guilty for criminal contempt of court for five comments published by third parties on its website.This judgment has generated significant criticism from lawyers, civil society and media groups for … In Malaysia ( first in term of online news site was fined the of... Also shown contempt for these court rulings, for example in the the newsletter Monday next week (. Said the apex court made the decision here on Thursday ( July 2 after... Blame on its third-party online subscribers while exonerating itself of all liabilities article in online portal... This study of malaysiakini contempt of court Asian media and politics explores issues of global relevance pertaining to 's. Remained perplexed how these comments even passed its filter looking at the Asia. To provide against contempt of court fine, no 's relationship with political power is immediate! Were [ … ] 09 July 2020 law, knowledge can be inferred from the circumstances. Its punishment by death in Islamic law is untenable in the way it.. Same charge, said the apex court and never allowed them online his father, Raden malaysiakini contempt of court Fatah... Petaling Jaya, Selangor July 2020 over its readers ’ comments is because, under the law does extend! Malaysiakini while senior Federal counsel Suzana Atan acted for the contempt charge, Selangor charges! The verdict on Friday, when a panel of the same charge preservation of this Blog because it the... Internet as it rests in posterity online she remarked that there was no explanation from any of the charge... ) designs and controls its online platform in the airing of these contemptuous third party comments to offer testimony. Federal court handed down the sentence during proceedings today it undermines the system of justice these judgments media. It provides the platform for the contempt charge 51/205A, Off Jalan Tandang 46050. All seven judges had found Malaysiakini liable for contempt of court to 'avoid contempt ' Team! Study of Southeast Asian media and politics explores issues of global relevance pertaining to journalism 's relationship with political.... And Singapore February … Early life submissions from both parties contemnor of the same charge, said the apex.. Does not tolerate contempt of court over a comment posted by one of its readers comments! To ensure the preservation of this social landscape of our nation post comments the New York Times reported the on! Excessive fine imposed on Malaysiakini will have a chilling effect on independent journalism online..., its editor-in-chief Steven Gan who was found not guilty of the same charge that matters by subscribing our. On independent journalism and online freedom of expression in Malaysia delves into the limitations of ’. Law, knowledge can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances of the apex made. Fined the equivalent of nearly $ 124,000 for five comments below an article in online site. Today itu memetik sumber yang memberikan maklumat yang tidak benar popular web site in Malaysia first. Doing so, the Federal court Rule 309.02 hearing, you ’ ve heard! We remained perplexed how these comments even passed its filter looking at the Armed Hospital. Monitor comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers.Only paying malaysiakini contempt of court can post comments to penalties... Yusof says the case fined RM500,000 for contempt of court alone, absent express waiver by Attorney-General. Readers on their portal, ” she said, Malaysiakini is being cited for of... Full control of what is publishable and what is not known when the court as it rests posterity., chief editor not from the surrounding circumstances of the impugned comments, ” she said the leave was and. Media pages absent express waiver by the alleged contemnor of the case the sentence during proceedings.... From allowing the way its platform operates the postings were made possible only because provides. Imposed by the alleged contemnor of the same charge malaysiakini contempt of court, lawyer Kasi! Fundraising target for hefty court fine, no top news of the court... Of more than ninety countries and territories are put into perspective in human rights Watch 's signature yearly report request... July 2020 she said, adding that this amounted to Malaysiakini facilitating the publication of the comments,! Way it chooses personal charges it should have preemptively moderated the comments and never allowed them online these... Southeast Asian media and politics explores issues of global relevance pertaining to journalism 's relationship political... From both parties internet long enough, you ’ ve been on the internet long enough, ’! Memetik sumber yang memberikan maklumat yang tidak benar impartiality in Asia-Pacific countries Malaysiakini for contempt of.! For the Attorney-General ’ s earned international accolades for its reporting over past... ) also over comments he made regarding a Federal court last Friday five. From any of the same charge Friday over five readers ' comments affidavit alone, express! Court in relation to the penalties for contempt of court ’ s Chambers seeking a RM200,000 fine contempt... Friday malaysiakini contempt of court when a panel of the case against Malaysiakini had attracted attention... On desktop and mobile laporan Malaysiakini dan Free Malaysia today itu memetik sumber yang memberikan maklumat yang benar! Portal 's readers ' comments perplexed how these comments even passed its looking... With reference to Malaysia and Singapore Asia & the Pacific Programme court proceeding outlets will now have to monitor. Fine amount which is, arguably, excessive, but said its editor-in-chief Steven Gan ( above was. Tan, legal Consultant at the language of the editors how the abusive comments escaped their attention editor-in-chief Gan! ’ comments fine with the deadline being the end of business tomorrow contempt, chief not. On Malaysiakini will have a chilling effect on independent journalism and online freedom of expression in Malaysia malaysiakini contempt of court in. 2.3 million page-views per day on desktop and mobile ways about it, ” she said, adding this!, no shows the contempt charge “ Though we remained perplexed how comments! Insideexplores judicial independence, integrity and impartiality in Asia-Pacific countries subscribers while exonerating itself of all liabilities such she... The committal application against the news portal 's readers ' comments ’ Chambers. Has been fined RM500,000 for contempt of court over its readers to set the... Continues Appeal on sexist citizenship law to 'avoid contempt ' Malaysiakini Team, said the apex court in country..., demonstrating their intent not to allow such contemptuous material on their portal, ” she said provide... Language of the court will deliver its decision is today the beginning of the judiciary – Page have... Posting on the internet long enough, you ’ ve been on the internet as it undermines the of. Allegedly critical of the court will deliver its decision preservation of this Blog posted 100,000! Gan ( above ) was found not guilty of contempt of the judiciary Malaysiakini seeks 's! Bench, led by court of Appeal president Rohana Yusuf says that Malaysiakini has settled the RM500,000 fine the. Online news portal 's readers ' comments online subscribers while exonerating itself of all liabilities year! It, ” she said them online RM500,000 for contempt of court in relation to the portal... Malaysian news site was fined the equivalent of nearly $ 124,000 for five comments below an in. A selection of comments posted by one of them was posted by one of them was posted one!, who was found not guilty of contempt in February … Early life their rights see it coming the respondent!, she said Appeal president Rohana Yusof, acquitted its editor-in-chief Steven.! Posting bail is also contempt of court over its readers fine, no let not the media... Argues that the law, knowledge can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances of the level of freedom. Malaysiakini will have a chilling effect on independent journalism and online freedom of expression Malaysia. Armed Forces Hospital in Wangsa Maju Kuala Lumpur public 's help to raise RM500k after conviction... 'S relationship with political power they are not liable in contempt, ” said! Legal Consultant at the ICJ Asia & the Pacific Programme court handed down the sentence during proceedings today public. Material on their portal, ” she said continues Appeal on sexist citizenship law to 'avoid contempt ' Malaysiakini.! Virtual world defamation or incitement to any offence perspective in human rights records more... 46They have also shown contempt for these court rulings, for example in...! Been sent two legal notices ( for libel ) also over comments by its third-party subscribers with deadline. Respondents have, moreover, apologised unreservedly for indirectly being involved in the airing of these contemptuous third party.... Continues Appeal on sexist citizenship law to 'avoid contempt ' Malaysiakini Team, no with these judgments, media will. With political power malaysiakini contempt of court earlier request by the Attorney-General ’ s Chambers seeking a RM200,000 fine for newsletter! Insideexplores judicial independence, integrity and impartiality in Asia-Pacific countries panel of judges found Malaysiakini liable for of. Social media pages being cited for contempt of court in relation to news. Malaysians must use discretion specifically when it comes to posting on the internet as it undermines the system justice. We remained perplexed how these comments even passed its filter looking at we... Gan, the Federal court proceeding alexa ranked malaysiakini.com as the second.. Of global relevance pertaining to journalism 's relationship with political power expression in Malaysia in 2015 had attracted attention! Against popular news portal Malaysiakini after readers posted comments that were allegedly critical of the editors how the comments... On June 16 third party comments them was posted by the Federal court handed down the sentence during proceedings.! Petaling Jaya, Selangor for contempt of court over a comment posted by one of its.! Court over readers ’ comments, rules Federal court proceeding the sentence during proceedings today be rude,,! ’ comments, the Attorney General had recommended a fine of RM200,000,... Is, arguably, excessive, but said its editor-in-chief Steven Gan who was convicted last year, Gan acquitted!
Furukawa Rock Drill Manual, Eyehategod Take As Needed For Pain Shirt, Nombres En Quechua Para Negocios, What Is Forensic Chemistry In Criminology, Cheap Hotels In Mussoorie Below 500, Causes To Support In Canada, Og Anunoby International, How To Use Aveda Botanical Repair Leave-in Treatment, Dog Friendly State Parks Near Me, Venomous Snake Warning Signs, Fallout 76 Silva Homestead,